18
Nov
Yet more stuff that doesn’t make sense
I can’t really put my finger on it, but does it look like most of Singapore’s worst arguments of logic coming from ladies?
Here’s another one, this time on the issue of overcrowding on the North-East line.
Increase frequency of trains on North-East Line
I TAKE the North-East Line, from Boon Keng Station to Dhoby Ghaut, to work in the morning. It is almost impossible to get into a cabin by the time the trains reach Boon Keng Station.At Farrer Park and Little India, only those who dared to push themselves (and others) can get aboard. The journey is extremely uncomfortable for everyone.
The seven minutes-a-train schedule was set when the flats in Punggol and Seng Kang were not filled, and when the country had a smaller population. Now, there are more people living in Punggol and Seng Kang - in fact, everywhere on our tiny island, contributing to our economy and making it ‘vibrant’. Unfortunately, a more vibrant Singapore is also a more crowded one.
Before SBS Transit starts comparing our trains to Tokyo’s, may I repeat the point a Singaporean who had lived in Tokyo made a couple of years ago when the crowded-trains problem was brought up: Our standard of personal hygiene is not on par with the Japanese’s. In addition, our humid climate makes us perspire and smell. It is no fun being pressed against bodies wet with perspiration and body odour early in the morning.
I hope SBS Transit will look into increasing the frequency of trains during the morning peak hours. If this is not possible, perhaps it could do what the Japanese did: designate a few carriages for women.
Kuah Kar Yoke (Ms)
Ms Kuah, I was happily reading your letter in hope that The Straits Times has finally decided to post something that makes sense. And then I saw your last paragraph.
Are you telling me that designating a “few” carriages for women will solve the problem of overcrowding on trains?
So we decide to take up this suggestion in its infinite wisdom and do just that. The ladies take up two or three carriages out of six on the train, and the smelly men are all packed into the other three cabins. How does that enable more people to pack into the same MRT train? We still have the same number of commuters trying to squeeze into the same train; designating sections for ladies will at its best improve the situation for the ladies. Men would have only 3 cabins to go to, compared to all 6 for the ladies. If that doesn’t sound sexist, her implicit declaration that men perspire and smell does.
I myself board the train at Boon Keng station, and I travel to Outram Park for my line transfer to the West line. What I’ve seen is that wait times for the next train will always be at least 5 minutes during the morning peak hours. Unless the train interval is there for the sake of safety (in which case I would have rather had the safety officers in the train manually operate the train during peak hours to enable more trains to operate at one time), I don’t see any other reason for operating that few trains, except perhaps SBSTransit is trying to get away with packing as many people like sardines into a can as it can get away with.
This is yet another example which shows that the competition situation in the transportation arena is sorely lacking. Without either competition or governmental regulation, passengers are the only losers in this game.
on November 18th, 2007 at 7:25 pm
I agree. Monopoly is a free ticket for the company to do as it desires. The problem, though, is that there is no way to insert competition in this case. It is a no-win situation for the commuters.
on November 18th, 2007 at 11:12 pm
After watching the following video, I am more educated about the feminist cause and have started understanding how they think.
Feminism interview
on December 28th, 2007 at 9:06 pm
It makes more sense IF YOU ARE A WOMAN. And if you’re not, it makes no sense at all!
But if you’re a woman, having a women-only car makes life a LOT more comfortable.
Actually, it can make life more comfortable for some men, too. Really thoughtful men make sure that their hands are up on the straps and in full view when the train is crowded, so that woman can feel a little bit safer from groping. And that can be tiring, if it’s a long commute. Sometimes being able to rest your arms is a good thing.
on December 28th, 2007 at 9:09 pm
The argument makes sense IF YOU ARE A WOMAN. Women-only cars make life a lot more comfortable for women, even if they are just as crowded as mixed cars.
It can make life more comfortable for men, too. Men who are really thoughtful make sure their hands are up on the straps, in full view, when the train is crowded, so that women around them can feel safe from groping. But that can be uncomfortable if the ride is a long one. Sometimes it’s nice to be able to rest your arms.
on December 28th, 2007 at 9:17 pm
Women-only cars make sense TO WOMEN. Especially women who have been groped on crowded trains, which (at least in Japan) is most of them. Life is a lot more comfortable, even if the train is crowded, if you are surrounded by women. If someone’s hand touches you in a sensitive spot, at least you know it WAS accidental.
It can be more comfortable for men, too. Very thoughtful men stand with their hands up on the straps in full view when the train is crowded, so the woman around them know they are safe. Sometimes it must be nice to be able to relax a bit and not feel as though every woman around you is regarding you as a potential pervert.
And yes, it has happened to me, and it is NOT NICE, and it makes you regard every man around you as a potential pervert. This is not fair on most men, either, I know, but you CAN’T TELL, so you have to be alert.